Thursday, January 3, 2008



I, for my part, would often make the pilgrimage alone to Jerusalem for the festivals, as is prescribed for all Israel by perpetual decree. Bringing with me the first fruits of the field and the firstlings of the flock, together with a tenth of my income and the first shearings of the sheep, I would hasten to Jerusalem and present them to the priests, Aaron's sons, at the altar. To the Levites who were doing service in Jeusalem I would give the tithe of grain, wine, olive oil, pomegranates, figs, and other fruits. And except for sabbatical years, I used to give a second tithe in money, which each year I would go and disburse in Jerusalem. (Tobit 1: 6-7)

Despite living in far-off Galilee, despite the political preference given the sanctuaries at Dan and Bethel, despite the religious practice of his family, friends, and neighbors Tobit held firm to the Jerusalem temple.

David had almost certainly chosen Jerusalem as his capital and the site of the temple because it was not traditionally associated with any of the twelve tribes. Jerusalem became the symbolic heart of a unified nation and common faith.

The rejection of Solomon's temple, no doubt politically motivated, can also be seen as a conservative religious reform. Rather than the new temple in Jerusalem the older sacred sites across the Northern Kingdom were restored.

The local sacred sites were historically meaningful, more receptive to local sensibilities, and much more convenient. But for reasons that are not explained - yet seemed clear enough to the first readers - Tobit chose Jerusalem.

Unity is uncommon, especially in matters of politics and religion. Tradition and tribe are strong draws. Joining with others -especially those perceived as "other" - requires a vision, love, and discipline that transcends our natural reflexes.

Above is Tobit and Anna by Barent Fabritius.

No comments: